Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Ableton Live MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for inspecting and controlling Ableton Live through a local HTTP bridge. Enables LLMs to perform production workflows like MIDI import, track editing, mixing, mastering, and export.
      59
      20 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server to control Ableton Live via the Live API, offering curated tools for transport, tracks, clips, devices, automation, and more, plus a generic layer to access the entire Live Object Model.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling Ableton Live, enabling AI assistants to interact with Live sessions through tools for track/clip/scene management, playback control, and device parameter adjustments.
      48
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but there is overlap among retrieval tools (get_session_info, get_track_structure, get_bulk_session_structure) and between bulk and single-operation tools (e.g., create_clip vs. bulk_edit_clips). Descriptions clarify these differences, so misselection is unlikely but possible.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use snake_case and follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_*, set_*, create_*, fire_*, stop_*, etc.), with only minor variations like the 'bulk' prefix. The convention is predictable throughout.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 33 tools, the server exceeds the typical well-scoped range. While Ableton Live is complex, several tools are convenience duplicates (bulk versions of single operations), making the set feel inflated rather than tightly scoped.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface covers many clip, device, and track operations but lacks essential lifecycle and mixer controls: no track deletion, no audio/return track creation, no scene creation/deletion, and no direct track volume/pan/send adjustment. These gaps would cause agent failures in common DAW workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues