Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Ableton Live MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local Python MCP server for inspecting and automating Ableton Live Sets, including MIDI editing, device control, audio analysis and groove tools. Connects MCP clients to a MIDI Remote Script and extension bridge on the user’s machine.
      97
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to control Ableton Live through a Max for Live device and optional Remote Script, covering tracks, clips, MIDI notes, mixer settings, transport, and plugin search and insertion.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for inspecting and controlling Ableton Live through a local HTTP bridge. Enables LLMs to perform production workflows like MIDI import, track editing, mixing, mastering, and export.
      59
      12 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server to control Ableton Live via the Live API, offering curated tools for transport, tracks, clips, devices, automation, and more, plus a generic layer to access the entire Live Object Model.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but a few read-oriented tools overlap: get_properties, get_device, and list_properties all inspect object state, and get_health/get_capabilities both report versions and feature probes. Descriptions help tell them apart, but an agent could still hesitate between them. Overall, the set is well differentiated for a large surface.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The server mostly uses snake_case, but mixes verb_noun names (get_properties, draw_automation, edit_notes) with single verbs (create, delete, launch, browse) and noun_action names (clip_action, device_action, follow_actions). This produces a readable but inconsistent pattern across 32 tools. A stricter verb_noun convention would make the set more predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    32 tools is heavy for an MCP server, and several families (properties, automation, notes, clip/device actions) could be consolidated. The domain—Ableton Live’s full production environment—is genuinely broad, so the count is defensible, but it sits at the borderline where selection effort becomes significant.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers much of Live’s API: tracks, scenes, clips, devices, parameters, notes, automation, routing, browser, conversions, and undo. Notable gaps include arrangement recording (transport lacks a record action), export/render, and track grouping, though most core workflows can be accomplished with workarounds. The set is fairly complete for its scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues