Skip to main content
Glama
Burp Suite for AI Agent

Burp Suite for AI Agent

by whoismemas

Related Servers

Alternatives to Burp Suite for AI Agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP security toolkit that integrates Burp-style HTTP proxying, AI-driven vulnerability hunting, source code auditing, and reporting into AI coding agents, enabling authorized security testing of web applications and source code.
      24
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable AI agents to run authorization-gated reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, web application testing, exploitation, CTF tasks, reporting, and integrations with tools such as Burp, ZAP, and DefectDojo.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets AI assistants analyze Burp Suite XML exports offline, without running Burp. Provides 19 tools for mapping endpoints, finding secrets, detecting vulnerabilities, analyzing headers, exporting curl commands, and generating pentest reports.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Exposes Burp Suite operations through a local authenticated HTTP server and an MCP stdio bridge, enabling tools like burp_proxy_history via MCP.
      0
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables authorized bug bounty automation via a scope-enforced MCP bridge, supporting web, secrets, mobile, and LLM red-team scanning, with reporting and advisory.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of the Burp Suite integration: clearing, status, requests (list/detail), endpoints, tasks, issues (list/import), session snapshot, and outbound actions (send/status). Despite some related operations, the descriptions clearly differentiate them, leaving no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'burp_' prefix with snake_case names. Verbs and nouns are used predictably (e.g., burp_clear, burp_requests, burp_import_issue). There is no mixing of conventions, ensuring easy pattern recognition.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for a Burp Suite bridge. It covers essential operations without being bloated or sparse. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count aligns with the expected complexity of security testing workflows.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core workflow: connection status, request capture, endpoint discovery, task and issue management, import, session retrieval, and outbound actions. Minor gaps exist, such as the lack of detailed views for individual tasks or issues, but these do not critically hinder the primary use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues