Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to kuruitsugizaki

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables agents to control FL Studio through an MCP interface, including running Python inside FL, capturing screenshots, sending clicks and keystrokes, writing multi-channel piano roll notes, and building full arrangements from a song spec without moving the cursor.
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    C
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Gives AI assistants full control of FL Studio through its scripting API, enabling project editing, mixing, piano roll composition, MIDI export, and plugin automation without touching the mouse or keyboard.
    57
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables Claude Desktop to drive FL Studio 2025 and 2026 through natural language, diagnosing and repairing mixes, configuring plugins, writing notes and chords in any scale, exporting arrangements to MIDI, and analyzing audio for tempo, key, and melody.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to create, modify, and save LMMS music projects programmatically, including tracks, notes, mixer control, effects, and song settings.
    52
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 13 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target distinct objects: plugins (installed plugins), presets (a plugin's presets), params (automatable parameters), project_read (one file), and profile (many files) are clearly separated. The main risk is fl_call vs fl_exec, both of which run code inside FL, but the descriptions explicitly frame fl_call as a single API call and fl_exec as multi-call logic, which mostly resolves it.

Naming Consistency3/5

There is a recognizable scheme — fl_* for live-link tools (fl_render, fl_install, fl_probe, fl_call, fl_exec, fl_transport) and project_* for file tools (project_read, project_write) — but the remaining tools are bare nouns (plugins, presets, params, profile, config) with no verb, so the set mixes prefixed-verb and plain-noun conventions. It stays readable and grouped, but not a single predictable pattern.

Tool Count5/5

13 tools is well within the healthy 3-15 range and each tool earns its place, covering distinct concerns (plugin discovery, presets, params, project I/O, rendering, profiling, config, install/probe, live API, transport). Nothing appears redundant or filler.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the domain broadly: plugin/preset/param discovery, project read/write with sound and effect references, render to audio, multi-project profiling, config, live-link setup, live API access, and transport control. A few conveniences (e.g., dedicated sample/loop browsing or mixer/track editing outside project_write) are absent, but the core create-read-render-play lifecycle is closed.

Maintenance

ActivityNo data
ResponsivenessNo issues