Skip to main content
Glama
wganalytics

mcp-secure-server-giulia-ai

by wganalytics
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-secure-server-giulia-ai

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Server with Authentication

      ahmad-act
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Implements a secure MCP server with API Key and JWT authentication, providing tools like echo, login, secure_action, and admin_action. Includes MCP Inspector integration for testing and debugging.
      1
      3
      MIT

    • Self-Documenting Zero

      lavishshakya
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server autonomously introspects SQLite databases to auto-generate CRUD tools and join prompts, while enforcing zero-knowledge security through pre-validated SQL templates.
      MIT

    • ServeMyAPI

      Jktfe
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A personal MCP server for securely storing and accessing API keys across projects using the macOS Keychain, letting AI assistants and applications retrieve credentials through natural language.
      25
      -

    • Credential Manager MCP Server

      mclamee
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A secure MCP server for local API credential management using JSON storage and a read-only default mode. It allows users to list, retrieve, and manage credentials via simple command-line tools and environment-based configuration.
      MIT

    • agent-keys

      Gonzih
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets AI agents autonomously acquire, store, verify, and manage API keys for various services.
      7
      0
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct function: one validates the API key and authenticates the user, the other lists all users. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The tool names are inconsistent: 'tool_segura' uses a vague 'tool_' prefix with a non-verbal name, while 'listar_usuarios' follows a clear verb_noun pattern. This mixed convention makes the set feel uncoordinated.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is at the low end of the acceptable range. It is understandable for a limited server, but the small count feels thin relative to the 'secure server' positioning.

    Completeness2/5

    The server covers authentication validation and listing users, but lacks user management operations such as get by ID, create, update, or delete. This creates significant gaps in the implied user management domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources