Skip to main content
Glama
chuance-policy-mcp

chuance-policy-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to chuance-policy-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search mainland China's national laws, administrative and local regulations, judicial interpretations, and Supreme People's Court guiding cases, and to retrieve metadata plus the original Chinese text of individual articles or full regulations and case narratives. Results carry issuing body, promulgation and effective dates, and in-force status, with keyless access and no fabricated snippets when a document can't be read.
      472 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to search Chinese statutes and verify legal citations locally, including detecting fabricated references in generated text. It supports natural-language queries, article lookup, and citation validation without registration, API keys, or network access.
      5
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to look up Chinese laws and statutory articles fully offline from a local SQLite database, resolving a law name plus article number to verbatim text, searching articles by keyword, and retrieving a law's chapter structure and version history. It also verifies citations in bulk, checking whether each quoted provision exists word-for-word and is currently in force.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides read-only, citation-grounded Chinese AI compliance and filing Q&A, enabling agents to search regulations, retrieve requirements, generate self-check lists, and determine filing obligations with legal basis.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to search roughly 4,600 Chinese legal-practice articles and guides by licensed lawyers, pinpoint and read individual provisions among 17,000+ statutes, and look up criminal charge elements, sentencing ranges, provincial compensation standards, courts, procuratorates, detention centers and other judicial resources, plus run 56 legal calculators. Responses return summaries and source links rather than full article text.
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct primary role: search, fetch full text, verify a single law article, verify citations in batch, check freshness, and list data sources. There is slight functional overlap (fetch_page_text and check_freshness both return publish dates, and verify tools fetch pages), but the descriptions clarify when each should be used.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a readable verb_noun pattern: search_gov_policy, fetch_page_text, batch_verify_citations, check_freshness. However, verify_law_article_tool adds an unnecessary '_tool' suffix and source_catalog is noun-only, so the pattern is not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a specialized policy/law research MCP. Each tool serves a distinct step in the research workflow—search, fetch, verify, batch verify, freshness check, and source transparency—without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the full core workflow: searching authoritative policy sources, retrieving page text, verifying individual and batch law citations, and assessing freshness. source_catalog also clarifies boundaries and data-source limitations, leaving no obvious dead ends for the stated purpose.