Skip to main content
Glama
wenyi3370-lgtm

chuance-policy-mcp

by wenyi3370-lgtm
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to chuance-policy-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • savantcat-ai-compliance-mcp by savantcat

      savantcat-ai-compliance-mcpofficial

      savantcat
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only, citation-grounded Chinese AI compliance and filing Q&A, enabling agents to search regulations, retrieve requirements, generate self-check lists, and determine filing obligations with legal basis.
      MIT
    • savantcat-answers-mcp by savantcat

      savantcat-answers-mcpofficial

      savantcat
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to query China's GB/T 47746—2026 AI customer-service compliance standard through five clause-level tools — question listing, keyword search, full cited answers, enterprise self-check lists, and standard metadata — over a public read-only streamable-http endpoint with no API key required. Answers include clause sources so compliance questions like mandatory human-handoff scenarios can be resolved without manually paging through the 40-page standard.
      1
      MIT

    • aluris-caselibrary-mcp

      alexchenlin1996-pixel
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables semantic search and retrieval of Chinese judicial cases from the Supreme People's Court case library, supporting natural language queries for similar cases, case details, filtering, and statistics.
      8
      9
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct primary role: search, fetch full text, verify a single law article, verify citations in batch, check freshness, and list data sources. There is slight functional overlap (fetch_page_text and check_freshness both return publish dates, and verify tools fetch pages), but the descriptions clarify when each should be used.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a readable verb_noun pattern: search_gov_policy, fetch_page_text, batch_verify_citations, check_freshness. However, verify_law_article_tool adds an unnecessary '_tool' suffix and source_catalog is noun-only, so the pattern is not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a specialized policy/law research MCP. Each tool serves a distinct step in the research workflow—search, fetch, verify, batch verify, freshness check, and source transparency—without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the full core workflow: searching authoritative policy sources, retrieving page text, verifying individual and batch law citations, and assessing freshness. source_catalog also clarifies boundaries and data-source limitations, leaving no obvious dead ends for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources