Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
wenshuo0114

file-reviewer

by wenshuo0114
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to file-reviewer

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • RepoPilot

      Riyazzshaik
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only GitHub repository inspection and deterministic intelligence through MCP tools for repository metadata, file contents, issue triage, pull-request risk signals, and GitHub Actions failure investigation.
      MIT

    • Security Scanner MCP Server

      rupeedev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive security scanning of code repositories to detect secrets, vulnerabilities, dependency issues, and configuration problems. Provides real-time security checks and best practice recommendations to help developers identify and prevent security issues.
      8 npm
      2
      MIT

    • ci-guard-mcp

      carelessdept
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run deterministic, read-only local repository audits for risky GitHub workflows, undocumented environment variables, possible credentials, and conflicting dependency configuration, returning structured findings without sending source code to a service.
      63 npm
      MIT

    • nittim

      ilanwolberger
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables code auditing, scanning for committed secrets and vulnerable dependencies, and generating self-review checklists, with optional paid audit pricing.
      MIT

    • Gumi-MCP

      igv8101
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to safely inspect a local repository's code and metadata while blocking private data from leaving the machine, providing read-only tools for search, change tracking, and integrity verification.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The tool set is cleanly separated into review_*, report_*, review_queue_*, and rollback_* families, and within review_* the scanning, secrets, external paths, user-level configs, metadata, and single-file read functions target different objects. Even actions like report_write_decision and report_external_choice are distinguishable by the description: one records a finding decision, the other records an external-reference choice.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The namespace-prefix pattern (review_/report_/rollback_/review_queue_) is consistent and predictable, but suffixes mix target nouns like file_metadata and secrets_inventory with imperative verbs like open, read, set_header, and write_fix. This is a minor style inconsistency rather than a functional confusion.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is above the typical 3-15 range, but each tool maps to a distinct step in an unusually complete review workflow: opening repos, scanning files/configs, queuing external paths, writing report entries, and managing rollbacks. The count feels slightly heavy for a single server, but no tool is redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the review lifecycle well, including entering repos, scanning files and configs, logging decisions and fixes, queuing external paths, and rollback safety. Minor gaps remain: there is no tool to read or finalize the full report from within the server, and rollback_create implies file edits without a matching edit tool, but agents can work around these using report paths and external file tooling.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources