Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to chrome

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables local opencode agents to control a live Chrome browser via MCP tools, including tab management, JavaScript execution, clicking, form filling, page reading, screenshots, and console log retrieval.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to control the user's real Chrome or Firefox tabs, with their existing logins, to read pages, click, type, fill forms, take screenshots, inspect network traffic and run JavaScript. It works through a paired browser extension over a local WebSocket connection, so automation happens in the browser the user is actually looking at, including shadow DOM, cross-origin iframes, dialogs and single-page apps.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Lets AI coding tools drive the user's already-signed-in Chrome browser — reading and snapshotting pages, clicking, typing, uploading files, screenshotting, and inspecting tabs, cookies, console, and network traffic. It works through a local Chrome extension bridge, so no remote debugging port is opened and the real, authenticated browser session is used.
      1 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any coding agent to use the user's existing Chrome profiles and logins to open tabs, read pages, fill forms, click through flows, and take screenshots.
      2,283 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to control a live Google Chrome browser, allowing tab management, navigation, clicking, typing, screenshots, and JavaScript evaluation through the user's real profile.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct concerns (navigation, interaction, inspection, storage, emulation), so an agent can pick correctly. Minor overlaps exist: opening a tab via tabs vs navigate(newTab=true), typing-with-Enter via type vs press, and visual tools screenshot/highlight. These are adequately differentiated in the descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Consistent snake_case throughout with no camelCase mixing, and a semi-predictable convention where interaction tools are verbs (click, type, drag, scroll) and inspection tools are nouns (status, tabs, console, network, cookies). The verb/noun mix and a few compound names (fill_form, upload_file, wait_for) keep it from being a strict single pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    24 tools is on the heavy side of the ideal range, but for a full browser-control surface covering navigation, input, DOM/a11y inspection, network, storage and emulation, each tool maps to a genuine capability. No obvious redundant tool inflates the count.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad and coherent across the browser lifecycle: navigation, tab management, DOM/snapshot/screenshot, input primitives, form fill, uploads, dialogs, console, network, cookies, emulation and debugger control. Gaps like explicit storage APIs and download handling exist but are workable via evaluate.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues