Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Esquie

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An enterprise-grade MCP server for AI-powered reverse engineering. Enables AI agents to perform comprehensive binary analysis through natural language commands.
      29 PyPI
      203
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A PyGhidra-based MCP server that exposes Ghidra's reverse engineering capabilities to AI agents, enabling binary analysis via tools like overview, search, view, list, edit, script execution, and version control.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A multi-backend MCP server that exposes binary analysis capabilities from IDA Pro and Ghidra, allowing LLMs to directly drive reverse-engineering tools via natural language.
      11
      158
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for reverse engineering Windows executables and related binary formats, offering static analysis, Ghidra-assisted function recovery, plugin-driven tooling, and optional isolated Windows runtime execution.
      2 npm
      242
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that integrates a headless Ghidra instance for binary reverse-engineering, enabling automated analysis and decompilation through a standardized interface.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for reverse engineering that enables interaction with IDA Pro for analysis tasks such as decompilation, disassembly, and memory engagement reports.
      24
      46
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: hex/dec/ascii conversions, XOR, hashing, pattern search, base64, notes CRUD, and sandbox operations (eval, reset, file transfer). No two tools overlap in function, and descriptions are sufficiently clear to avoid misselection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming conventions are mixed: noun_to_noun for conversions (hex_to_dec, dec_to_hex), verb_noun for notes (set_note, get_note, delete_note), and a mix for sandbox tools (python_eval, reset_sandbox, upload_to_sandbox). While all use snake_case, the verb placement is inconsistent, making the set slightly less predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is slightly high for a utility server, but each tool covers a distinct function across three clusters (conversion/encoding, notes, sandbox). The count is reasonable for the breadth of capabilities offered, though a few conversion tools could potentially be consolidated.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is comprehensive for a hex/binary utility server with sandboxing. It covers conversion, encoding, hashing, pattern search, full note CRUD, and sandbox lifecycle including file upload/download/list. No obvious dead ends or missing core operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues