list_targets
Retrieves the list of registered target machines in the socket server, providing an overview of available endpoints for operations.
Instructions
列出已注册的靶机(占位实现,后续接靶机注册表)。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieves the list of registered target machines in the socket server, providing an overview of available endpoints for operations.
列出已注册的靶机(占位实现,后续接靶机注册表)。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions being a placeholder, but does not explain what happens on invocation (e.g., returns empty list, errors) or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, front-loading the purpose. Every word is necessary given the simplicity of the tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite the simple interface without parameters or output schema, the description fails to specify what calling the tool returns or how to interpret results, especially given it is a placeholder.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter details, which is acceptable as there are none to describe.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists registered target machines. However, it is a placeholder implementation, which slightly reduces clarity about its current functionality.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The placeholder note hints it may not be ready, but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use instructions are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/weihang1258/mcp_socket_server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server