Skip to main content
Glama
wei9072

aegis

by wei9072
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to aegis

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Waymark by waymarks

      Waymarkofficial

      waymarks
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that intercepts and controls AI agent actions in your codebase by enforcing policies on file operations and commands, with logging, approval workflows, and rollback capabilities.
      -

    • repo-guard

      darkm3tter
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that enforces deterministic policies for coding agents, inspecting file writes and shell commands to allow, deny, or require confirmation based on configurable rules.
      3 npm
      MIT

    • PolicyPin

      preprint-labs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to enforce repository rules and block unauthorized file edits or commands, even after context compaction, by running as a local zero-config MCP server.
      2
      MIT

    • agent-locks

      luohoa97
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A filesystem-based MCP server for AI coding agents to coordinate work across git worktrees by claiming files, checking for conflicts, and logging progress without affecting the repository's git history.
      5
      MIT

    • godkiller-mcp

      taurus42119-stack
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enforces hard quality gates on AI coding agents, including forced web search, planning, and empirical test execution, to prevent common failure modes and ensure production-grade code.
      13
      21 PyPI
      25
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage and scope: post-write attestation, pre-write single-file validation, and pre-write workspace-aware validation. No overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a clear verb_noun pattern: 'attest_path', 'validate_change', 'validate_change_with_workspace'. The naming is consistent and descriptive.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools cover the essential validation and attestation workflow without redundancy. The count is well-scoped for the server's purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers pre-write and post-write validation, but lacks a tool for batch workspace-wide analysis without a specific change. Minor gap for complete coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources