Skip to main content
Glama
wedo911

readability-mcp-server

Related Servers

Alternatives to readability-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to score prose from 0-100 for formulaic AI writing tells using pure rule-based heuristics, exposing tools to analyze inline text or files on disk and return violation details, band labels, and concrete advice without any LLM judge or network calls.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to score English text readability with Flesch, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, SMOG, and text statistics, without storing the submitted text.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Scores prose from 0 to 100 for formulaic AI writing patterns using purely programmatic rules, with no LLM judge or API calls. Enables agents to lint text or files and receive a score, band label, specific violations with surrounding context, and concrete advice for each hit.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to analyze and improve readability of text using local deterministic metrics like Flesch Reading Ease and lexical diversity, without sending data to external services.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to analyze text strings or files for formulaic AI writing patterns, returning a 0–100 score, band label, specific violations with context, and concrete advice. It performs this rule-based linting locally without LLM judges or API calls.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      PublishReady helps AI agents turn drafts into cleaner, publish-ready writing using deterministic local metrics. It checks readability, structure, AI-sounding prose, revision targets, and factual preservation without external API calls.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one measures readability metrics, the other rewrites text to simplify it. There is no overlap or ambiguity in choosing between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent pattern: domain prefix 'readability_' plus verb_noun pairs ('score_text', 'simplify_text'). The naming is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side for a server, but it is a tightly focused scope: measuring and simplifying readability. It feels slightly minimal but each tool earns its place.

    Completeness5/5

    For the stated purpose of assessing and improving plain-language readability, the server covers both key operations: evaluating a text's readability and rewriting it into plainer language. No obvious critical gap exists.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues