Skip to main content
Glama
wedo911

citeguard

by wedo911
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to citeguard

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • CiteStamp MCP server by citestamp

      CiteStamp MCP serverofficial

      citestamp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Ground citations before your agent emits them by checking references against public scholarly registries and flagging hallucinated or retracted ones.
      MIT

    • io.github.lonexreb/retractguar

      lonexreb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools to check reference lists for retracted or problematic citations, retrieve nuanced editorial statuses with evidence, and monitor institutions for newly flagged papers using open data from OpenAlex, Retraction Watch, and Crossref.
      3
      MIT

    • verification-mcp

      guptaprakhariitr
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fact-check claims, verify citations, and check source freshness using Wikipedia, Wikidata, Crossref, and Wayback Machine.
      1
      -

    • AgentCite

      Kevinx702
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Fabrication-free, DOI-backed citations for AI content and agents, using openAlex public-domain data with resolvable DOIs. Includes an API and planned MCP server for agent-native citation retrieval.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    check_citations (bulk scan of text) and check_citation (single DOI) have overlapping purposes, and the near-identical singular/plural names invite misselection. However, each description explicitly cross-references the other with 'use X instead' guidance, so an agent can reliably choose the right one.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools use consistent snake_case with a clear verb_noun shape, and the singular/plural convention neatly signals single vs. bulk behavior. The only downside is that the two names differ by a single character, which is a mild collision risk.

    Tool Count4/5

    Two tools is on the thin side, but the domain (checking retraction status of DOIs) is genuinely narrow and the single/bulk split is the one meaningful axis of variation. Nothing feels gratuitous, though a third tool would be hard to justify.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: check one DOI, check many DOIs in a block of text, with defined verdicts and error handling. A minor gap is the absence of any way to resolve a citation lacking a DOI (e.g. by title/author) into a checkable identifier.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources