update_moderator

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already include destructiveHint: true, indicating mutation. The description adds no additional context about behavior, such as whether changes are immediate, if confirmation is needed, or what side effects occur. It does not contradict the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, succinct sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and to the point. However, it could be slightly expanded to include important operational details without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 10 boolean parameters and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the response format (e.g., returns the updated moderator object), whether the operation is idempotent, or how to interpret the boolean fields. The destructive hint is present in annotations, but the description should clarify scope.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already describes each parameter. The description does not add extra meaning, such as default values or behavior when a field is omitted. This meets the baseline expectation but provides no added value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update a moderator's permissions', indicating the action and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_moderator, delete_moderator, and get_moderator. However, it does not specify that it performs a partial update (only changing the provided fields), which could be clarified.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, such as requiring the current user to have appropriate permissions, or when to use create_moderator to add a new moderator versus update_moderator.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.