cleanroom-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to cleanroom-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for high-fidelity code audits, refactoring, and architectural analysis using specialized Proxy Experts.85-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA governed MCP server with OAuth 2.1 + PKCE, declarative tool scoping, row-level data filters, per-identity rate limits, and a tamper-evident audit trail.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server implementing a multi-phase backend for structured model interactions, bounded compilation, exact-hash confirmation, and Codex-run provenance, with trust-separation hardening.1-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA reference MCP server that enforces identity-aware tool access using role-based permissions (Reader, Analyst, Auditor) and supports multiple identity routes like Entra RBAC, Copilot Studio, and Okta XAA. It provides read-only access to test evidence with explicit denial paths for unauthorized tools.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that provides tools for architecture analysis, risk diagnosis, quality metrics, and regression guarding to support AI-driven code review and incremental refactoring workflows.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceThis MCP server enables security auditing for MCP configurations and AI agents, including prompt injection testing, data flow tracing, and security policy generation.30 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but cleanroom_spec_read and cleanroom_impl_read_spec overlap in that both read specs, though the former has role-based restrictions and the latter is specifically for handed-off specs. Overall, the separation is clear enough.
All tools share the cleanroom_ prefix and use snake_case, but the pattern varies between domain_verb (cleanroom_init, cleanroom_status) and domain_object_verb (cleanroom_spec_create, cleanroom_audit_log). This is mostly consistent but not perfectly uniform.
19 tools is on the higher side but reasonable for a full clean-room workflow covering setup, team management, specs, audit, implementation, and verification. Each tool serves a distinct function in the process.
The core lifecycle is covered (init, spec creation/review/handoff, audit, verification), but there is no tool to edit or delete a draft spec, and no way to remove team members. These gaps could hinder workflow efficiency but are not fatal.