Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to cleanroom-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A governed MCP server with OAuth 2.1 + PKCE, declarative tool scoping, row-level data filters, per-identity rate limits, and a tamper-evident audit trail.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server implementing a multi-phase backend for structured model interactions, bounded compilation, exact-hash confirmation, and Codex-run provenance, with trust-separation hardening.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A reference MCP server that enforces identity-aware tool access using role-based permissions (Reader, Analyst, Auditor) and supports multiple identity routes like Entra RBAC, Copilot Studio, and Okta XAA. It provides read-only access to test evidence with explicit denial paths for unauthorized tools.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides tools for architecture analysis, risk diagnosis, quality metrics, and regression guarding to support AI-driven code review and incremental refactoring workflows.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables security auditing for MCP configurations and AI agents, including prompt injection testing, data flow tracing, and security policy generation.
      30 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but cleanroom_spec_read and cleanroom_impl_read_spec overlap in that both read specs, though the former has role-based restrictions and the latter is specifically for handed-off specs. Overall, the separation is clear enough.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the cleanroom_ prefix and use snake_case, but the pattern varies between domain_verb (cleanroom_init, cleanroom_status) and domain_object_verb (cleanroom_spec_create, cleanroom_audit_log). This is mostly consistent but not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count4/5

    19 tools is on the higher side but reasonable for a full clean-room workflow covering setup, team management, specs, audit, implementation, and verification. Each tool serves a distinct function in the process.

    Completeness3/5

    The core lifecycle is covered (init, spec creation/review/handoff, audit, verification), but there is no tool to edit or delete a draft spec, and no way to remove team members. These gaps could hinder workflow efficiency but are not fatal.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues