Skip to main content
Glama
webscraping-ai

WebScraping-AI MCP Server

Official

Get Selected Element HTML

webscraping_ai_selected
Read-only

Extract the HTML of the first page element matching a CSS selector from a URL, enabling targeted web data scraping.

Instructions

Get the HTML of the first page element matching a CSS selector. API docs: https://webscraping.ai/docs#selected

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
jsNoExecute on-page JavaScript using a headless browser (false by default).
urlYesURL of the target page.
proxyNoType of proxy: datacenter, residential, or stealth (datacenter by default). Use residential if the site restricts datacenter traffic, or stealth for the most heavily protected sites with advanced anti-bot detection. Residential and stealth requests cost more than datacenter — see the pricing page.datacenter
deviceNoType of device emulation.
formatNoResponse format (json or text).json
countryNoCountry of the proxy to use (US by default).
timeoutNoMaximum web page retrieval time in ms (20000 by default, maximum is 30000).
selectorYesCSS selector to extract content for.
wait_forNoCSS selector to wait for before returning the page content.
js_scriptNoCustom JavaScript code to execute on the target page.
js_timeoutNoMaximum JavaScript rendering time in ms (3000 by default).
custom_proxyNoYour own proxy URL in "http://user:password@host:port" format.
error_on_404NoReturn error on 404 HTTP status on the target page (false by default).
error_on_redirectNoReturn error on redirect on the target page (false by default).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.2.2
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.5
    • changedInput schema / properties / country / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "us",
      -  "gb",
      -  "de",
      -  "it",
      -  "fr",
      -  "ca",
      -  "es",
      -  "ru",
      -  "jp",
      -  "kr",
      -  "in"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "us",
      +  "gb",
      +  "de",
      +  "it",
      +  "fr",
      +  "ca",
      +  "es",
      +  "ru",
      +  "jp",
      +  "kr",
      +  "in",
      +  "hk",
      +  "tr"
      +]
  3. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.0.4
    • changedInput schema / properties / proxy / description
      Previous value: -"Type of proxy, datacenter or residential (datacenter by default)."New value: +"Type of proxy: datacenter, residential, or stealth (datacenter by default). Use residential if the site restricts datacenter traffic, or stealth for the most heavily protected sites with advanced anti-bot detection. Residential and stealth requests cost more than datacenter — see the pricing page."
    • changedInput schema / properties / proxy / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "datacenter",
      -  "residential"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "datacenter",
      +  "residential",
      +  "stealth"
      +]
  4. Addedv1.0.2

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true, so safety is covered. The description does add one genuinely useful behavioral fact — only the FIRST matching element is returned, so extra matches are silently ignored — but says nothing about cost, rate limits, or failure behavior for a paid scraping API.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the core behavior and with zero redundancy. The trailing docs URL is a reasonable pointer but occupies half the text without adding inline value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 14-parameter, mutation-free read tool with a fully documented schema, the description is adequate but minimal. It omits the first-match caveat's practical implication (no error when zero matches), and gives no sense of the response shape or cost, though the scope claim is correct.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with detailed prose on proxy tiers, timeouts, js flags, and enum options, so the schema carries the parameter burden. The description adds no syntax or default information beyond it, which makes the baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Get), resource (HTML of the first matching page element), and a precise selection mechanism (CSS selector), which implicitly separates it from the whole-page sibling webscraping_ai_html and the plural webscraping_ai_selected_multiple. It stops short of naming those siblings explicitly, so an agent must infer the routing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to prefer this over webscraping_ai_html, webscraping_ai_text, or webscraping_ai_selected_multiple, and no mention of prerequisites such as JS rendering being needed. The only pointer is a documentation URL, which is a reference rather than usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.