Skip to main content
Glama
webscout9-png

TestHeal

by webscout9-png
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to TestHeal

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • testing-toolkit-mcp

      byreshb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides coding agents with visibility into test health through tools for flaky test detection, test quality linting, and LLM evaluation harness, enabling them to triage failures, review test quality, and check prompt changes for regressions.
      9
      Apache 2.0

    • Debugging MCP Server

      luischang07
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to automatically diagnose coding errors through codebase search, test execution, and live debugger integration (DAP/V8 CDP). Provides a secure, policy-gated environment for investigating failures while preventing destructive operations.
      9
      -

    • FailTrace

      LBarimi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to capture and replay intermittent software failures, minimize reproductions, compare trials, search regressions, verify proposed fixes against a saved failing baseline, and retrieve investigation evidence without rerunning commands.
      74 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool handles a distinct stage of a clear pipeline: diagnose, propose, assess. There is no overlap or ambiguity about which tool to call at each step.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: diagnose_test_failure, propose_minimal_fix, assess_fix_safety. The verbs clearly indicate distinct actions and the nouns describe the target artifact.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is on the smaller side, but each covers a necessary phase of the test-fix workflow. The count is reasonable for a focused MCP server, though slightly thin.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the core diagnose-propose-assess lifecycle well. A minor gap is the lack of an explicit tool to apply or commit the fix, but that may be intentionally outside the server's scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources