stape_list_powerups

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It conveys a read operation (list) but leaves ambiguity in 'available and active'—whether these are separate categories or a combined state. It does not disclose potential errors, permissions, or return format, though this is a low-risk listing action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant words. It efficiently communicates the action and resource, with examples for clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally adequate. However, the ambiguity of 'available and active' and the lack of any guidance on return behavior or usage conditions leave gaps that could confuse an agent. Sibling tools provide some context but not enough to fully complete the picture.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage with 'container_identifier' described as 'Unique container identifier.' The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'List' and identifies the resource as 'power-ups for a container', with parenthetical examples (Custom Loader, Cookie Keeper, GEO Headers, Anonymizer). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like enable/disable power-up tools and other resource-specific tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage as the listing counterpart to enable/disable power-up tools, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites or conditions, leaving the agent to infer context from sibling tool names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.