Skip to main content
Glama
wcsmars

Personal Memory MCP

by wcsmars

Related Servers

Alternatives to Personal Memory MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents and other MCP clients to read and write the same durable facts in a local SQLite memory, searched by embedding plus full text and separated into global and per-repository scopes, with a browser notebook and ZIP backup/migration. Runs over stdio or HTTP, keeping search on-machine and secrets redacted before storage.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides a local stdio MCP server that gives AI coding agents a typed, temporal, evidence-backed memory on embedded SQLite, letting them record decisions and constraints, ask why something happened, navigate memory by time, trace proof paths between refs, and export or supersede stored state without rewriting it. It also exposes read-only ChronoLoom view tools so a person and their agent can steer the same multidimensional memory view by semantic intent rather than raw coordinates.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables development agents to keep persistent memory: proposing and reviewing workspace-scoped content, running hybrid search over accepted sources, and resuming projects with auditable history and provenance. It exposes 32 MCP tools over stdio and authenticated Streamable HTTP, with optional embeddings and rerank.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct role: search retrieves answer content, history audits revisions/tombstones, and status reports configuration. Search and history both perform temporal memory lookups, so an agent could occasionally confuse them, but the descriptions explicitly demarcate answer context versus audit data.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tools use the same memory_ prefix with a short noun-like suffix, giving a clear and predictable pattern. No mixing of conventions or verb styles.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is on the low side but each maps to a genuinely different capability (retrieve, audit, diagnose). The thinness is acceptable for a focused read-oriented memory interface, though it borders on under-scoped.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface is entirely read-only: there is no tool to store, update, or delete a memory, so the core write lifecycle of a personal memory system is absent. The mention of 'write availability' in status hints at writes happening elsewhere, which agents cannot invoke through this server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues