Solana Metrics MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Solana Metrics MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceOn-chain investigation and analysis tools for Solana blockchain, enabling detection of wash trading, funding source tracing, holder concentration analysis, and MEV/bundle activity identification.43-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides comprehensive analytics and insights for Solana wallets and their DeFi activities, including transaction tracking, DeFi position monitoring, risk profiling, and strategy recommendations.30 npm7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides Solana infrastructure awareness including RPC health, priority fee estimation, leader schedule, chain state, latency comparison, and keyless transaction submission.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSolana DeFi Intelligence MCP server enabling natural language queries for wallet analytics, DeFi positions, protocol metrics, and token prices.81MIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceProvides comprehensive analytics for Solana wallets, enabling real-time portfolio insights, cross-protocol DeFi position monitoring, behavioral analytics, and AI-powered investment strategy recommendations across the Solana ecosystem.3-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAgent-safe management of independent Solana validators and RPC nodes over MCP and CLI: Solana-aware status, in-place upgrades, and DNS failover. Every change is dry-run by default, policy-gated, and audited, and it never touches keypairs.15Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The tools have mostly distinct purposes, but 'analyze_metrics' and 'generate_dashboard' could be confused as both involve processing metrics. 'list_metrics' and 'search_rust_code' are clearly distinct for data retrieval and code search respectively. The overlap is minor and descriptions help differentiate.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case throughout: analyze_metrics, generate_dashboard, list_metrics, search_rust_code. This predictability makes it easy for agents to understand and use the toolset.
With only 4 tools, the server feels thin for a metrics domain that typically involves more operations like filtering, aggregating, or updating metrics. While the tools cover key areas, the count is borderline minimal for comprehensive metrics handling.
The toolset covers listing, analyzing, visualizing, and searching metrics, but lacks operations for creating, updating, or deleting metrics, which are common in metrics management. There are notable gaps that agents might need to work around for full lifecycle coverage.