WAVE MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to WAVE MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to control DualStream streaming studio: switch scenes, compose layouts, manage widgets, and react to stream events.30Apache 2.0

Upstream MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables an AI assistant to run cloud live streaming end to end: starting and stopping broadcasts, reordering playback queues, searching and organizing the media library, planning stream schedules, and managing multistream destinations. It connects over a remote Streamable HTTP endpoint secured with OAuth or a personal access token, applying the same validation, ownership rules, and rate limits as the public REST API.1MIT- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables management of multi-platform streaming through the Restream API, allowing control of streaming channels, stream settings, and access to analytics across platforms like YouTube, Twitch, and Facebook through natural language.912 npm1MIT

APIVerve MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to 249+ production-ready APIs through the Model Context Protocol, enabling AI assistants to fetch weather, news, geocoding, validation, and more data.2 npm3MIT- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceAI-powered stream and recording control for OBS Studio through the Model Context Protocol1009Apache 2.0
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query and control a bio-hybrid neuromorphic simulation pipeline, including SNN engine, consciousness proxies, and neuroplatform telemetry, via the Model Context Protocol.50MIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct resource/action pair: design extraction, contract validation, stream lifecycle, camera control, billing reads, and analytics. Even similar-sounding tools like wave_design_contract vs wave_design_contract_check are clearly separated by compose-vs-validate semantics, and wave_get_viewers vs wave_get_stream_metrics are distinguished by account-wide vs single-stream scope.
Most tools follow a consistent wave_<verb>_<noun> pattern across streams, productions, billing, and camera actions. Minor deviations like wave_design_contract (noun as operation), wave_voice_converse (noun-verb order), and wave.ask (dot separator instead of underscore) keep it from a 5.
With 24 tools spanning design, productions, streams, billing, camera control, captions, voice, and a meta-planning tool, the server feels like an API grab-bag rather than a tightly scoped set. Most tools have a concrete purpose, but the count is on the heavy side for an MCP server.
Core workflows are present for stream lifecycle, production switching, design extraction/validation, analytics, and camera commands. However, there are notable gaps: wave_create_clip and wave_control_camera depend on recording/camera IDs with no discovery tool, and most resources lack update/delete operations.