Skip to main content
Glama
watchdealer-pavel

WatchBase MCP Server

list_brands

Retrieve a comprehensive list of all watch brands available in the database. Use this tool to access brand information for watch research, cataloging, or application development.

Instructions

Retrieve a list of all brands in the database.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • Handler logic for the 'list_brands' tool. Sets the API endpoint path to 'brands' without requiring arguments. The shared API call code (lines 235-246) executes the HTTP GET request to https://api.watchbase.com/v1/brands.
    case 'list_brands':
      // No specific argument validation needed
      apiPath = 'brands';
      break;
  • src/index.ts:121-125 (registration)
    Registration of the 'list_brands' tool in the tools list, which is returned by ListToolsRequestSchema handler (line 181). Includes input schema defining no required parameters.
    {
      name: 'list_brands',
      description: 'Retrieve a list of all brands in the database.',
      inputSchema: { type: 'object', properties: {} }, // No input required
    },
  • Input schema for 'list_brands' tool: accepts an empty object (no parameters).
    inputSchema: { type: 'object', properties: {} }, // No input required
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states this is a retrieval operation but doesn't mention important behavioral aspects like whether results are paginated, sorted, limited in count, or if authentication is required. For a list operation with zero annotation coverage, this leaves significant gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that states exactly what the tool does with no wasted words. It's appropriately sized for a simple retrieval tool and front-loads the essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a list retrieval tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is insufficiently complete. It doesn't describe what format the list returns (e.g., array of brand objects with specific fields), whether there are limitations on the result set, or how the tool behaves in different scenarios. The simplicity of having zero parameters doesn't compensate for these gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and schema description coverage is 100%, so there are no parameters to document. The description appropriately doesn't attempt to explain nonexistent parameters, earning a baseline score of 4 for this dimension.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Retrieve a list') and resource ('all brands in the database'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like 'list_families' or 'list_watches' that likely follow similar patterns for different resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'search' or 'get_watch_details'. It doesn't mention whether this is for browsing all brands versus filtered searches, or what context would make this the appropriate choice among the sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/watchdealer-pavel/watchbase-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server