store-vm-credentials

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the behavioral transparency burden. It does not disclose if credentials are overwritten, how encryption works, or any side effects. The schema mentions password encryption, but the description does not reinforce this or add new behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, making it concise. However, it lacks structure and is overly minimal for a tool with 8 parameters. Every sentence should earn its place; this one is adequate but could be expanded without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the high parameter count and absence of output schema, the description is too brief. It does not explain the purpose of required parameters, the effect of storing credentials, or how the tool fits into the broader set of sibling tools. More context is needed for an AI agent to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 50%, yet the description adds no parameter semantics beyond the schema. Required parameters (vmId, vmName, vmIp) are not explained in context, and missing descriptions for adminPassword and others are not compensated for.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (store) and resource (ansible-admin credentials for a VM). It distinguishes from siblings like retrieve-vm-credentials and list-vm-credentials by implying storage rather than retrieval. However, the phrase 'in context' is vague and could be more specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With siblings like retrieve-vm-credentials and list-vm-credentials, explicit usage context is missing. The description does not mention prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.