get_dashboard_stats

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations provided, and the description is straightforward, indicating a read-only operation that retrieves summary statistics. It does not disclose potential caveats like data freshness or permissions, but the simplicity of the tool (no parameters, no side effects) makes the behavioral disclosure adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the purpose and includes the key metrics. Every word contributes to the meaning, with no redundancy or unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, no output schema, no nested objects), the description fully specifies what the tool returns. It is complete and sufficient for an agent to understand the tool's functionality.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no additional parameter information, but none is needed. Baseline score for no parameters is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool provides an overview of the domain portfolio, listing specific metrics like total domains, online count, expiring, and alerts. It is a specific verb ('get') and resource ('dashboard stats'), and the listed metrics distinguish it from sibling tools that focus on individual domains or specific aspects.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for a high-level overview, but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention when not to use it. Given the simplicity of the tool and no siblings that directly compete, this is acceptable but leaves room for improvement.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.