Get Tool Schema

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It states 'Get complete schema', implying a read operation without side effects, but does not disclose auth needs, rate limits, or return format. Adequate for a simple retrieval but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no wasted words. Purpose is front-loaded, and the TIP is placed at the end for easy reference.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Though no output schema exists, the description explains the return ('complete schema... including inputSchema'), which is sufficient for an agent. Sibling tools provide context. Minor improvement could specify the exact return structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions ('Exact name of the tool', 'Name of the MCP server'). The description adds no extra parameter meaning beyond the schema, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Get complete schema for a specific tool from a specific server, including inputSchema', using specific verb+resource. It distinguishes from siblings like call-tool (invocation) and find-tools (discovery).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit TIP provides guidance: 'Use find-tools first to discover the tool and get the correct serverName and toolName', telling the agent when to use this tool and suggesting an alternative prerequisite tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.