restart_deployment
Restart a deployment by its ID to resolve issues or apply configuration changes.
Instructions
Restart a specific deployment
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| deploymentId | Yes | The deployment ID to restart |
Restart a deployment by its ID to resolve issues or apply configuration changes.
Restart a specific deployment
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| deploymentId | Yes | The deployment ID to restart |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Restart' without explaining what that entails — whether it causes downtime, requires special permissions, triggers a new build, or is reversible. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundancy or extraneous words. It is appropriately concise for a simple tool with one parameter.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a one-parameter mutation tool with no output schema, the description is minimally sufficient to identify the action and required parameter. However, it omits behavioral context such as potential downtime, return values, or effects, leaving some gaps for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema fully describes the deploymentId parameter with a clear description, and the tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. With 100% schema coverage, the baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Restart' and the resource 'a specific deployment', distinguishing it from sibling tools like redeploy_service or remove_deployment. The verb+resource combination is specific and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as deploy_service or redeploy_service. The description does not mention any prerequisites, use cases, or exclusions, leaving the agent without context for tool selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wardspan/railway-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server