A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceEnables natural language automation of Cisco SD-WAN vManage, including device management, template deployment, policy configuration, monitoring, and software upgrades.
2
MIT
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN MCP Server
by waqasdaar
Related Servers
Alternatives to Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI clients to query SD-WAN fabric health, devices, tunnels, BFD sessions, OMP peers, alarms, policies, and configuration state via natural language, with deterministic correlation and diagnostics for incident assessment.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Cisco Meraki networks through natural language, including organizations, networks, devices, switches, wireless, and appliances.1GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query HPE Aruba Networking Central data (sites, devices, clients, alerts, events) through natural language.99 PyPI7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely access and query Prisma SD-WAN operational data for inventory, health checks, topology analysis, and policy verification through natural language.275MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLMs to turn natural-language prompts into validated, deployed Cisco network topologies, including routing, switching, DHCP, VLANs, security auditing, and live device inspection.MIT
TDQS
C2.9/5.0
Scored across 83 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Most tools target distinct resources (OMP, BFD, BGP, CloudExpress, config groups), but several fabric-wide control tools overlap heavily (get_control_summary, get_control_status, get_control_count, get_control_network_summary) and OMP has similar summary/status variants. Descriptions help somewhat, but an agent could easily misselect among these near-duplicates.
Naming Consistency4/5
Names overwhelmingly follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_devices, get_omp_peers, get_bfd_summary), which is easy to scan. Minor deviations appear in generic API tools (search_api_operations, describe_api_operation, call_api_operation) and preview_config_group_device_config, but the convention remains readable.
Tool Count2/5
83 tools is far beyond a reasonable surface for one server and forces agents to sift through many near-duplicate monitoring endpoints. While the SD-WAN domain is broad, the count feels inflated and would benefit from consolidation into aggregate or parameterized tools.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers a wide range of SD-WAN monitoring domains (devices, control/OMP, BFD, BGP, templates, policies, UX 2.0 groups) and provides a generic API escape hatch for uncovered operations. Some lifecycle gaps remain (most tools are read-only; write coverage relies on call_api_operation), but core observability is well represented.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues