Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Antigravity CLI Use

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Codex or Claude Code to orchestrate persistent Antigravity CLI workers as independent implementers and testers within restricted workspace roots. It supports asynchronous task dispatch, progress polling, result inspection, follow-up messages, and cancellation with bounded, audited local event logging.
      556 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables multiple CLI-based AI agents to collaborate as a coordinated team through shared task queues, shared memory, and a message bus, with DAG orchestration, rate-limit avoidance, parallel dispatching, and long-task management.
      63
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI harnesses to delegate code analysis, modification, testing, and long-running tasks to the locally installed Antigravity CLI via stdio MCP, with job status tracking and conversation continuity.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to delegate complex multi-step programming and research goals to coordinated teams of specialized subagents, with cross-session messaging, swarm and pipeline workflows, sandboxed workspace tools, persistent SQLite state, and a live dashboard.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Multi-agent orchestration server that enables parallel task delegation, sequential pipelines, cron scheduling, and cross-model peer review via CLI providers like Codex, Antigravity, OpenCode, and Claude Code.
      42
      7 npm
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., jobs vs sessions vs workflows), but some overlap exists: `get_job_status` and `get_job_result` could be confused, and `refresh_account_usage` vs `get_account_usage` have subtle differences. Descriptions clarify boundaries, but the set is dense with similar-sounding operations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Predominantly consistent verb_noun pattern (list_jobs, cancel_job, submit_job) with minor deviations like `cli_execute` (noun_verb) and `session_turn` (noun_noun). Still mostly predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    21 tools is on the heavy side for a CLI orchestration server, bordering the 16-25 'heavy' range. Some tools feel like thin wrappers (e.g., health_check, list_models), but the domain is broad enough to justify many.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers job lifecycle (submit, cancel, status, result), session management (open, turn, close, list), workflow orchestration (analyze, submit, wait, status), and account/model discovery. Minor gaps: no explicit delete or update operations for jobs/workflows, but core workflows are well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues