td_ping
Verifies that the TouchDesigner bridge is online. Use to test connectivity before sending other commands.
Instructions
检查 TouchDesigner 桥接是否在线。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Verifies that the TouchDesigner bridge is online. Use to test connectivity before sending other commands.
检查 TouchDesigner 桥接是否在线。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; the description implies a read-only check but does not explicitly state non-destructiveness, return format, or side effects. For a ping, this is acceptable but could be more explicit.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, complete sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Sufficient for a tool with no parameters and a simple purpose; does not describe return values, but the context of sibling tools makes its function clear.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no extra parameter info, which is acceptable given the baseline for zero parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'check' and the resource 'bridge online', distinguishing it from sibling tools that perform operations like connect, create, or destroy.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage is to verify connectivity before other operations; no explicit when-not or alternatives are needed for a simple ping, but direction is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/wangpolanshan/touchdesigner-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server