Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to jev-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP clients with typed, probabilistic decisions (choices, probabilities, scores) from TypeSafe's System One model, offering validated outputs and flexible provider support.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to call TypeSafe's JEV classifier and receive structured, typed judgments with probabilities for binary, choice, and scoring questions.
      1
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to consult TypeSafe's Jev through a judge tool, answering narrow typed questions with calibrated probabilities instead of prose.
      27 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to get machine-readable yes/no, choice, and score decisions from TypeSafe Jev, bridging fast classification to Cursor and other clients.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to send a context, question, and named choices to Jev System One, returning the selected choice, confidence, and per-choice probabilities.
      470 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables typed, calibrated judgment calls through classify, score, check, and batched ask tools, each returning full probability distributions for programmatic decisions.
      5
      470 npm
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: setup handles key onboarding, while noul, choice, score, and classify map to different question types (binary, single-choice, ordered-scale, batch). The descriptions explicitly call out boundaries, such as noul being for yes/no only and classify being a batched version of choice.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names are all single lowercase words with no mixed conventions, which keeps them readable and predictable. The slight deviation is that setup describes an action while noul, choice, score, and classify follow the official TypeSafe question-type naming, but this is minor and does not cause confusion.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a focused Jev/TypeSafe MCP server: one setup tool plus four distinct query/question types. Each tool maps to a clear capability and none feel redundant or missing.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full apparent lifecycle of using Jev: setup for authentication and noul/choice/score/classify for the available question types. There are no obvious dead ends—setup returns verification, every query tool returns structured results, and classify aggregates batch outputs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues