Skip to main content
Glama
wangkant

reelsmith

by wangkant
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to reelsmith

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • VE-MCP

      assebler-grkha
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to autonomously edit videos into publish-ready vertical short-form content, including silence removal, subtitle generation, voiceover synthesis, color grading, and composite pipeline creation.
      MIT

    • cutroom

      0xpratzyy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to edit talking-head videos locally by transcribing footage, applying validated edit operations like cutting fillers and silences, adding zooms, captions, looks and branding, and checking results with rendered previews. Agents can also read pinned editor feedback notes with annotated frames, resolve them, and export MP4, SRT or OTIO while the user watches changes live.
      290 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Vibie MCP

      PratikOfTheWest
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to natively control FilmCraft and Adobe Premiere Pro timelines for editing tasks such as rough cuts, silence removal, audio normalization and ducking, color grading, object masking, vertical auto-reframing, HyperFrames graphics, and exports. It auto-detects the running NLE and provides safe, reviewable operations with audit receipts and undo checkpoints.
      17 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct stages of the reel workflow (edit → check → preview → render → review), and descriptions make the differences explicit. A few pairs are close enough to invite misselection: preview vs review (stills from the project vs frames from the delivered mp4), check vs typecheck, and note vs notes (append vs read).

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The set mixes bare verbs (render, preview, draw, speak, capture, edit), bare nouns (manual, library, assets, notes), and only two snake_case compounds (new_project, import_asset). Singular/plural siblings note/notes add to the inconsistency, though every name remains readable and guessable.

    Tool Count4/5

    19 tools is on the heavy side of the ideal 3-15 band, but the domain is genuinely broad (project setup, editing, validation, rendering, voice, generated/imported assets, components, notes). Almost every tool maps to a real workflow step; only the doc/note trio (manual, notes, note) feels auxiliary.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: create project, edit atomically, undo, validate, preview, render, and review the delivered film, plus asset acquisition (import, capture, draw, animate) and voice narration. Minor gaps: no project listing/deletion or script-editing tool, and clipping/caption or audio-track authoring is only implied through edit ops and file tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources