Skip to main content
Glama
wanbnn

MCP UI Research

by wanbnn
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP UI Research

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • stitch-bridge

      jlhernando
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI coding agents the ability to design UIs through Google Stitch. It generates production-ready HTML and screenshots from natural language prompts.
      9
      MIT

    • browser-mcp

      hupeng9995
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A powerful MCP server for UI designers and developers to extract, analyze, and clone website front-end code (HTML, CSS) with pixel-perfect accuracy using browser automation.
      11
      7 npm
      3
      MIT
    • mcp-review by apatureai

      mcp-reviewofficial

      apatureai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for in-loop design review of web previews. It enables agents to submit a preview URL, receive structured findings with suggested fixes, and recheck after applying changes, while never editing code itself.
      5
      2
      MIT

    • Niblet

      mnunes94
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server gives coding agents real product screen references, design references, and font/icon materials from a curated catalogue so UI work is grounded in actual designs rather than generic templates. It also ships the skill's workflow documents and diagnostic tools, making them readable without a token.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct phase: research, inspection, memory, recall, and review. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (research_niche, inspect_reference, remember_delivery, recall_project, review_implementation).

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools perfectly cover the core workflow without unnecessary extras, fitting well within the ideal range.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full research-to-review lifecycle: gather info, store delivery, recall past work, and assess implementation. No obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources