get_app

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations to rely on, so the description must carry the behavioral transparency burden. It only says 'Get detailed information' without disclosing what information is returned, whether the operation is read-only, error behavior for non-existent app IDs, or permission requirements. This is minimal disclosure for a read operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is direct and free of extraneous words. It is appropriately sized for a simple getter tool and front-loads the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema, and the description gives a basic idea of its function. However, 'detailed information' is vague and does not specify what information is included, such as configuration, status, or tags. It is minimally complete but lacks useful contextual detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage for its single parameter, app_id, with a clear description. The tool description adds no additional parameter semantics, but the schema already provides sufficient meaning. This aligns with the baseline of 3 for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: retrieving detailed information about a specific application. The verb 'get' and resource 'application' are precise, and the word 'specific' implicitly distinguishes it from list_apps, which likely lists multiple applications. However, it does not explicitly name the alternative or the distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that app_id can be obtained from list_apps, nor does it state any prerequisites or exclusions. The description simply restates the tool's action without contextual direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.