Skip to main content
Glama
w4sspr

uk-charities-mcp

by w4sspr
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to uk-charities-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • datagov-uk

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables access to UK government open data via the data.gov.uk CKAN API, allowing querying of datasets through natural language or direct MCP tools.
      4 npm
      MIT

    • Companies-House-MCP-Server

      fab-ai-up
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing the full UK Companies House Public Data API, enabling natural language queries for company profiles, search, officers, filing history, charges, insolvency, and persons with significant control, as well as downloading and reading PDF documents.
      -

    • What Do They Know

      paulieb89
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for UK Freedom of Information research. Connects AI assistants to WhatDoTheyKnow — the UK's largest FOI request platform to search requests, read responses, look up public authorities, and draft new requests.
      8
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools are mostly distinct (financials, trustees, governing document), but get_charity_details overlaps by including trustees and finances, which may cause an agent to pick the wrong tool. The descriptions help clarify depth, but the boundary is not fully crisp.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow the get_charity_* pattern (get_charity_details, get_charity_financials, get_charity_trustees), but get_governing_document deviates by omitting the 'charity' prefix. Overall the naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools, the server is compact and focused on key charity information lookups. The count is reasonable for a specialized read-only API, though on the lower end, it fits the stated purpose.

    Completeness2/5

    The server lacks any search or discovery capability—all tools require a registration number, with no way to find charities by name or criteria. This is a significant gap that will cause agent failures when the registration number is unknown. The domain is also missing common operations like listing charities or getting contact details separately.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources