Jira Enterprise MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Jira Enterprise MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceCustom MCP server for interacting with Jira, supporting issue management, search, and project operations.531 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for interacting with self-hosted Jira instances using Personal Access Token (PAT) authentication. It enables users to perform CRUD operations on issues, search with JQL, manage comments, and list projects through the Jira REST API.12627 npm13MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA local MCP server for Jira Cloud-driven development. Connects MCP clients to Jira for searching issues, reading tasks, parsing attachments, and mapping projects to local repos.1022 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that exposes Jira issue operations (get, search, create) as tools for AI clients like Claude.76 npmISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that wraps the Jira REST API v3, enabling issue management, searching, commenting, and transitions for openmrs.atlassian.net via Basic Auth.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server for self-hosted Jira Server, exposing REST API v2 tools for search, issue creation/update, transitions, comments, and more to AI clients via MCP protocol.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but `jira_add_attachment` and `jira_add_comment_with_attachment` overlap in attachment functionality, potentially causing misselection. Descriptions help clarify, so ambiguity is minimal.
All tools follow the `jira_verb_noun` pattern consistently. Naming is predictable and clear, with only minor exceptions like `search` (no noun) which is still unambiguous.
17 tools is slightly above the typical well-scoped range but reasonable for a complex system like Jira. The set covers many aspects without being excessive.
Core issue operations (create, read, update, transition) are covered, but a delete issue tool is missing. Other gaps like project management and user operations are acceptable for a focused MCP server.