sync_lsposed_scope

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description implies mutation ('sync') but lacks details on side effects, permissions, or what 'readback' entails. Minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise but overly terse, sacrificing clarity. No structure to highlight key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite lacking output schema and having 4 parameters with no descriptions, the description provides almost no context about what syncing does, how parameters affect behavior, or what the readback contains.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the four parameters (targetPackage, serial, includeSystemFramework, dryRun). Missing all parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it syncs the LSPosed scope for AlgorithmAide and returns a readback. The verb 'sync' and resource 'LSPosed scope' are specific, and the tool is distinct from sibling tools like sync_appswitch_state or hook-related tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as sync_appswitch_state or hook tools. No context about prerequisites or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.