cfr-compliance-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to cfr-compliance-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that turns the US Code of Federal Regulations into an agent-navigable citation graph, enabling traversal of regulatory references and detection of stale citations via structured tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceThis MCP server provides access to US Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR), enabling AI agents to query and retrieve regulatory data through natural language.1 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceThe most comprehensive keyless federal-data MCP server. 36 tools for SAM.gov + USAspending + Federal Register + eCFR + Grants.gov. No API key, no registration, no signup. Works in Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, Continue, Gemini CLI, and any MCP-aware host.153369 npm10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA modular MCP server providing structured, methodology-driven prompt endpoints for rapid legal/compliance landscape mapping, gap discovery, and risk prioritization across privacy, IP, AI governance, security, consumer, and disclosure domains, with argument-based adaptability to any product context.8 npm6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for U.S. federal law that enables searching the U.S. Code, CFR, Federal Register, case law, and bills, with citation verification against primary sources to prevent hallucinations.11MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePro Se Engine is an MCP server that provides 39 legal research tools across 6 government APIs, enabling AI agents to access case law, SEC filings, federal legislation, regulations, government contracts, and document processing workflows.-
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools are clearly separated by operation type and granularity: retrieve_section/part/title, get_title_structure vs get_version_history, and list_agencies are all distinct. The main area of potential confusion is search_regulations vs search_by_keyword, though the descriptions do explain the free-text vs keyword-list difference.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: search_*, retrieve_*, get_*, and list_*. The use of retrieve for legal text and get for metadata/history is a predictable and readable convention.
Eight tools is well-scoped for a CFR research server. The set covers search, retrieval at three granularity levels, structural navigation, version history, and agency lookup without redundancy or bloat.
The core CFR workflow is well covered: search, navigate structure, retrieve text, and check historical versions. A minor gap is the lack of an explicit list_titles or list_parts tool, but get_title_structure and list_agencies provide workarounds for discovering the CFR hierarchy.