MCP SSDLC Security Toolkit
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP SSDLC Security Toolkit
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAutomates 85-95% of the Secure Software Development Lifecycle (SSDLC) planning phase through multi-role AI orchestration, enabling business analysis, threat modeling, test strategy design, and security code review.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceIntegrates authoritative security compliance frameworks (ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, OWASP ASVS, NIST SSDF) into AI-assisted development, offering control lookups, cross-framework mappings, build-time guardrails, and automated audit evidence generation.152 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides SDLC compliance verification as tools that AI agents can invoke, continuously monitoring and evaluating development processes.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables authorized compliance verification and security auditing through natural language, bridging AI assistants with industry-standard security tools for enterprise audits.24-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates SAST, DAST, IAST, and SCA security testing tools for AI-powered DevSecOps automation, enabling comprehensive security scanning and reporting through natural language interfaces.17MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered security scanning of codebases through conversational analysis, allowing users to assess, threat model, code review, DAST test, and generate security reports using natural language with Claude.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but there is minor overlap between run_diagnostic_playbook and run_environment_diagnostics, and between get_coding_guidelines and get_secure_template. Descriptions are clear enough to differentiate.
The majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., analyze_code_security, list_domains). However, two tools (security_threat_model, workspace_snapshot) deviate by omitting a verb, creating a minor inconsistency.
With 17 tools, the server is well-scoped for a security toolkit covering requirements, design, threat modeling, code analysis, CI/CD, testing, diagnostics, and domain management. Each tool earns its place.
The toolset covers major SSDLC phases (requirements, design, implementation guidance, analysis, testing, CI/CD). Minor gaps exist, such as lack of deployment security scanning or compliance checks, but core workflows are supported.