Skip to main content
Glama
vuongdat67

MCP SSDLC Security Toolkit

by vuongdat67

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP SSDLC Security Toolkit

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Automates 85-95% of the Secure Software Development Lifecycle (SSDLC) planning phase through multi-role AI orchestration, enabling business analysis, threat modeling, test strategy design, and security code review.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Integrates authoritative security compliance frameworks (ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, OWASP ASVS, NIST SSDF) into AI-assisted development, offering control lookups, cross-framework mappings, build-time guardrails, and automated audit evidence generation.
      152 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides SDLC compliance verification as tools that AI agents can invoke, continuously monitoring and evaluating development processes.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables authorized compliance verification and security auditing through natural language, bridging AI assistants with industry-standard security tools for enterprise audits.
      24
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates SAST, DAST, IAST, and SCA security testing tools for AI-powered DevSecOps automation, enabling comprehensive security scanning and reporting through natural language interfaces.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered security scanning of codebases through conversational analysis, allowing users to assess, threat model, code review, DAST test, and generate security reports using natural language with Claude.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but there is minor overlap between run_diagnostic_playbook and run_environment_diagnostics, and between get_coding_guidelines and get_secure_template. Descriptions are clear enough to differentiate.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., analyze_code_security, list_domains). However, two tools (security_threat_model, workspace_snapshot) deviate by omitting a verb, creating a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 17 tools, the server is well-scoped for a security toolkit covering requirements, design, threat modeling, code analysis, CI/CD, testing, diagnostics, and domain management. Each tool earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers major SSDLC phases (requirements, design, implementation guidance, analysis, testing, CI/CD). Minor gaps exist, such as lack of deployment security scanning or compliance checks, but core workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues