stop_app
Stop a specified Android app by providing its package name, forcibly terminating the process on the connected device.
Instructions
Stop an app on the connected Android device
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| package_name | Yes |
Stop a specified Android app by providing its package name, forcibly terminating the process on the connected device.
Stop an app on the connected Android device
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| package_name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only says 'Stop an app', with no details on whether this is a graceful shutdown, force stop, or if it clears data. The behavioral impact is unclear.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it lacks necessary details, making it under-specified rather than appropriately sized.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple tool (one parameter, no annotations, no output schema), the description should still provide context on expected behavior and requirements. It is incomplete; for example, it does not mention that the app must be running or what happens on failure.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has one parameter ('package_name') with no description. The description does not explain what 'package_name' means or how to obtain it. With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to add any value for parameter understanding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Stop') and the target ('an app on the connected Android device'), with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'uninstall_app' or 'kill_emulator'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'force_stop' vs 'kill_emulator'). The description provides no context on prerequisites or typical use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/vs4vijay/espresso-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server