Skip to main content
Glama
secure-github-ops

secure-github-ops

Secure GitHub Ops MCP Server

Created by Aaron Murillo

An MCP server that makes GitHub automation actually safe. Every write operation needs approval before it runs, so you never have to worry about runaway scripts creating 100 issues while you're grabbing coffee.

What This Does

You know how most automation just... does stuff immediately? This flips that. When you (or an AI) try to create an issue, open a PR, or add a comment, it goes into a pending queue. Then someone with admin access reviews and approves it. Only then does it actually hit GitHub.

Two roles:

  • Operators can request actions

  • Admins can approve, deny, and see what's pending

Everything gets logged so you have a full audit trail.

Related MCP server: GitHub MCP Server

Getting Started

You'll need Node 18+ and a GitHub token.

cd secure-github-ops
npm install
cp .env.example .env

Open .env and fill in your stuff:

GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_your_token_here
ADMIN_API_KEYS=some-secret-admin-key
OPERATOR_API_KEYS=some-secret-operator-key

Then run it:

npm run build
npm start

For dev mode with hot reload:

npm run dev

Using with Claude Desktop

Add this to your Claude Desktop config:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "secure-github-ops": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/path/to/secure-github-ops/dist/index.js"],
      "env": {
        "GITHUB_TOKEN": "ghp_your_token",
        "ADMIN_API_KEYS": "your-admin-key",
        "OPERATOR_API_KEYS": "your-operator-key"
      }
    }
  }
}

The Tools

For operators and admins:

  • github.issues.create - request to create an issue

  • github.pr.open - request to open a PR

  • github.comment.add - request to add a comment

Admin only:

  • admin.approve_action - approve and run a pending action

  • admin.deny_action - reject a pending action

  • admin.list_pending_actions - see what's waiting

How It Works

Say an operator wants to create an issue:

// Operator requests it
{
  "tool": "github.issues.create",
  "arguments": {
    "_authToken": "operator-key",
    "owner": "myorg",
    "repo": "myrepo",
    "title": "Fix the login bug"
  }
}
// Returns a pending action with an ID

Nothing happened on GitHub yet. Now an admin checks what's pending:

{
  "tool": "admin.list_pending_actions",
  "arguments": { "_authToken": "admin-key" }
}
// Shows the pending issue request

Admin approves it:

{
  "tool": "admin.approve_action",
  "arguments": {
    "_authToken": "admin-key",
    "actionId": "the-uuid-from-before"
  }
}
// NOW the issue gets created

Config Options

GITHUB_TOKEN (required) - Your GitHub PAT with repo access

ADMIN_API_KEYS (required) - Comma-separated admin keys

OPERATOR_API_KEYS (optional) - Comma-separated operator keys

ALLOWED_REPOS (optional) - Lock it down to specific repos like owner/repo1,owner/repo2

LOG_LEVEL (optional) - debug, info, warn, error

About the STDIO Transport

This uses STDIO, which means it talks through stdin/stdout. All the logs go to stderr so they don't mess with the protocol. If you're wondering why there's no console.log anywhere, that's why.

Want HTTP instead? That's on the roadmap. The core code stays the same, just swap the transport.

Running Tests

npm test

26 tests covering auth, config, and the pending store.

Docker

docker build -t secure-github-ops .
docker run -e GITHUB_TOKEN=... -e ADMIN_API_KEYS=... secure-github-ops

What's Next

Eventually adding HTTP transport so you can host this as a service. Also thinking about persistent storage for the pending actions (right now they live in memory).

Available Tools

6 tools
admin.approve_actionA

Approve and execute a pending action (v1.0.0). Admin role required. This is the ONLY way to execute GitHub write operations.

Inputs: actionId (required).

admin.deny_actionA

Deny a pending action (v1.0.0). Admin role required.

Inputs: actionId (required), reason.

admin.list_pending_actionsB

List pending actions (v1.0.0). Admin role required.

Inputs: status, tool.

github.comment.addA

Add a comment to a GitHub issue or pull request (v1.0.0). Creates a pending action that requires admin approval.

Inputs: owner (required), repo (required), issueNumber (required), body (required).

github.issues.createA

Create a GitHub issue (v1.0.0). Creates a pending action that requires admin approval before executing.

Inputs: owner (required), repo (required), title (required), body, +2 more.

github.pr.openA

Open a GitHub pull request (v1.0.0). Creates a pending action that requires admin approval before executing.

Inputs: owner (required), repo (required), title (required), head (required), +3 more.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: admin tools handle approval/denial/pending, while github tools target unique actions (comment, create issue, open PR). No overlap exists.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a domain.subdomain.action pattern, but admin tools use verb_noun (e.g., approve_action) while github tools use noun.verb (e.g., comment.add) and an abbreviation (pr.open). This minor inconsistency is manageable.

    Tool Count5/5

    6 tools is well-scoped for a secure approval workflow with limited GitHub write operations. Each tool serves a necessary role without bloat.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers creation and commenting but lacks update, delete, or merge operations for GitHub resources. Admin tools are complete for approval, but the overall surface feels incomplete for typical GitHub write needs.

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers