admin.list_pending_actions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It indicates a read-only operation ('List') and a role requirement, but does not mention pagination, rate limits, or any side effects. The absence of output schema info further limits transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of a single sentence with essential elements: action, version, and role. It is front-loaded and efficient. However, it could slightly expand on the listing scope without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 optional params, no output schema), the description is somewhat incomplete. It does not indicate what fields are returned, whether pagination is needed, or the default behavior when no filters are applied. For a complete understanding, an agent would need more context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides 100% coverage with descriptions for both parameters (status with enum, tool as filter string). The description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists pending actions, with a specific verb and resource. It includes the version and required admin role, distinguishing it from sibling tools like approve/deny which are actions on actions. No other list tool exists among siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'Admin role required', giving a clear prerequisite for usage. However, it does not specify when to use this tool vs alternatives or when not to use it. It lacks guidance on prerequisites beyond role, such as needing existing pending actions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.