The tools list_parties and coverage_status both report on which of the 19 parties are indexed, with only minor differences (chunk counts vs. a coverage table). This overlap could cause misselection, while search_programmes and get_party_programme are clearly distinct.

Tool names are consistently lowercase with underscores and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (list_parties, search_programmes, get_party_programme). The exception is coverage_status, which uses a noun phrase, but it remains readable and predictable.

With exactly 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of listing, checking coverage, searching, and retrieving election programme content. Each tool has a clear role and the count is appropriate.

The server covers the core read-only workflows: listing parties, verifying indexing status, performing keyword search, and fetching chunked content. No obvious gaps exist for the stated domain of accessing Wahlprogramme and Wahl-O-Mat data.