Skip to main content
Glama
voska

Hass-MCP

by voska
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Hass-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • hass-mcp

      HiTechLabTN
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Home Assistant integration with Claude and other LLMs, enabling querying and controlling Home Assistant entities, automations, and dashboards.
      29
      MIT

    • Home Assistant MCP Server

      miguelg719
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that integrates with Home Assistant to provide smart home control capabilities through natural language, supporting devices like lights, climate systems, locks, alarms, and humidifiers.
      3
      MIT

    • Home Assistant MCP Server

      hekmon8
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A server that enables interaction with Home Assistant devices and automations through the Model Context Protocol, allowing users to monitor device states, control devices, trigger automations, and list entities.
      4
      48
      MIT

    • ha-mcp

      qubit999
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server for Home Assistant that exposes full control over entity states, service calls, history, templates, and areas via local stdio, enabling AI assistants to manage your smart home.
      9
      163 npm
      MIT
    • Home Assistant MCP Server by homeassistant-ai

      Home Assistant MCP Serverofficial

      homeassistant-ai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Home Assistant, control smart home devices, query states, execute services, and manage automations via natural language.
      77
      69,504 PyPI
      5,278
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct resources, but several overlap: entity_action vs call_service_tool both invoke services (the former is just a convenience wrapper), and list_entities (with its search_query param) vs search_entities_tool both perform entity search. The detailed descriptions cross-reference each other and help steer the agent, but a few genuine selection ambiguities remain.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The majority follow a clean verb_noun pattern (list_dashboards, add_card, remove_view, get_history, get_statistics). However, three tools carry inconsistent _tool suffixes (domain_summary_tool, search_entities_tool, call_service_tool) and a few use noun-first names (entity_action, system_overview) or bare verbs (restart_ha), breaking the otherwise consistent convention.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 29 tools this is heavy, and 13 of them are dashboard/Lovelace operations (card/view CRUD plus backups) that dominate the surface. While each dashboard operation is distinct, the overall set is well past the comfortable 3-15 range and several card/view tools could arguably be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage for entities, history/statistics, services, dashboards, and system diagnostics is strong end-to-end. Gaps exist around automations (only list_automations, no create/edit/trigger), scripts, scenes, and area listing, but call_service_tool provides a general escape hatch so agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources