Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to midas-memory-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first memory for AI agents: one store shared by Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, Pi, Hermes, OpenClaw, and any MCP client. Plain markdown with YAML frontmatter on your disk, hybrid BM25 + vector recall with per-result provenance (Recall X-ray), a correction contract, and the MemCorrect benchmark.
      211
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local-first cross-agent memory for AI coding agents. Persistent, shared memory over MCP — what you tell one agent can be recalled by another — with all data stored in a single local SQLite file, no cloud and no API keys.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first, source-grounded memory for AI agents, with citations, bitemporal history, review-gated corrections, and MCP tools for search and recall.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local-first persistent memory for AI agents via MCP, enabling semantic search and memory sharing across agents with zero cloud cost and full privacy.
      13 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first, file-based memory layer for AI agents — one shared Markdown vault across Claude, Codex, Gemini, Cursor and any MCP client. Provides read/write memory tools with an audit trail, per-agent trust levels, and Git sync; no cloud and no lock-in.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct memory operation: storage, retrieval, deletion, inspection, checks, context assembly, and commitment tracking. Detailed descriptions clearly differentiate similar-looking tools like recall, memory_state, and open_loops.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., check_forbidden_action, remember_code). Single-word verbs like capture and maintain are exceptions but still clear and predictable within the naming convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    23 tools is a reasonable number for a comprehensive memory MCP server. Each tool serves a specific and justified purpose, covering storage, retrieval, maintenance, auditing, and checks without redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full memory lifecycle: creation (remember, capture), retrieval (recall, memory_state, project_state), deletion (forget, forget_all, forget_matching), maintenance (maintain, memory_policy), and auditing (audit_use, stats). Missing update is handled via supersession, and additional features like context assembly (build_context, resume) and conflict detection (memory_conflicts) round out the set.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessSlow