gitverse-connector
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@gitverse-connectorshow me the recent commits in the current repository"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
GitVerse Connector for Codex
GitVerse Connector is a local MCP plugin that makes GitVerse feel native in Codex. It discovers the official GitVerse MCP tool catalog at runtime, presents concise typed tools to Codex, and uses the official Public API only as a read-only fallback when MCP is unavailable.
What is implemented
GitVerse MCP discovery and forwarding for supported repositories, files, branches, commits, releases, merge requests, tasks, CI/CD, users, teams and stars.
A normalized
gitverse_connection_statustool with safe diagnostics.REST read fallback for the current user, repositories, branches, repository contents, commits, tasks, merge requests, releases, workflows, runs, jobs and job logs.
Direct, Bridge and automatic transport selection; pagination and limits remain part of the upstream GitVerse schemas.
Confirmation gates for destructive or high-impact calls such as deleting a file, changing repository settings, publishing a release, updating a pull-request branch, or dispatching a workflow.
The connector intentionally does not create a generic request(url, method, body) tool.
Related MCP server: mcp-gitlab-crunchtools
Install in Codex
This plugin is registered in the local personal marketplace. In a terminal run:
codex plugin add gitverse-connector@personalStart a new Codex task afterwards so the tool list is refreshed.
Authentication
GitVerse MCP and the Public API use the same GitVerse API token. Create one in GitVerse token management, selecting only the entities and read/write access you need. The actual scope names are defined by GitVerse during token creation; this connector does not invent additional scopes.
Windows: secure token storage
Run this locally. It prompts for the token without echoing it and stores it in the current Windows user's Credential Manager:
Set-Location <path-to-gitverse-connector>
.\scripts\save-token.ps1If Windows Terminal does not paste into the secure prompt, copy the token first and use the clipboard mode instead. The token is not displayed:
Set-Location <path-to-gitverse-connector>
.\scripts\save-token.ps1 -FromClipboardTo avoid replacing the copied token with the command itself, double-click scripts\\save-token-from-clipboard.cmd after copying the token in GitVerse. The helper reads the clipboard only when you launch it.
Restart Codex after saving. The connector reads the encrypted value only in its local process and never returns it in an MCP result.
For a temporary development session only, set GITVERSE_TOKEN in the process environment; never place it in .env committed to Git.
Transport modes
GITVERSE_TRANSPORT=auto is the default:
use
https://mcp.gitverse.ru;on a direct MCP network failure, use the GitVerse Public API for supported read-only operations;
if direct access is unavailable, use a local bridge when it is running and configured.
direct disables bridge fallback. bridge only uses the bridge. Authentication (401), permissions (403), rate limiting (429) and validation errors are never treated as a reason to ask for a new token or retry through another transport.
Local Bridge
The bridge is for a local Codex/Desktop process that can reach 127.0.0.1. It is not an Internet proxy and intentionally cannot expose a cloud-only Codex environment to a local machine without a separately deployed, authenticated relay.
Set a long random session secret in GITVERSE_BRIDGE_SESSION_SECRET, then run:
& "$HOME\plugins\gitverse-connector\scripts\start-bridge.ps1"The bridge listens only on 127.0.0.1:47831, verifies a signed timestamp and nonce, rejects replays, limits requests, and permits only documented GitVerse MCP calls. The GitVerse token stays at the bridge; the connector sends only signed operation requests.
Permissions and write safety
Use a read token for browsing repositories, code, history, tasks, merge requests and CI status. Use write access only when you intend to change those entities. The connector displays the owner/repository/branch parameters through the typed GitVerse tool schema and requires confirm: true for high-impact calls. It does not retry a create, merge, delete, release publish, or workflow dispatch when the outcome is unknown.
Troubleshooting
GitVerse does not open / Russian IP restriction: run
gitverse_connection_status. A DNS, timeout or TLS failure is reported as a network or regional-access problem, not as an invalid token. In a local Desktop environment use Bridge mode.401: the token is absent, expired or invalid. Create a new token only after confirming this status.
403: the token is valid but lacks access to this entity or repository.
429: the connector respects
Retry-Afterand backs off only safe read requests.MCP unavailable: supported reads use the official REST fallback automatically in
automode.Bridge unavailable: start the bridge, verify the same session secret is present in the bridge and Codex process, and keep it bound to localhost.
Development
cd "$HOME\plugins\gitverse-connector"
npm test
node server/index.jsNo dependency installation is required: the project uses Node.js built-ins. See architecture and the compatibility matrix.
Available Tools
1 toolgitverse_connection_statusA
Safely check GitVerse transport and authentication readiness. It never returns tokens.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It explicitly guarantees the tool never returns tokens, which is a critical security property. 'Safely' implies non-destructive behavior, though it doesn't explicitly state read-only or what side effects (if any) exist. The token guarantee is the highlight, but additional detail about side-effect-free operation would improve it.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, dense sentence that conveys purpose and a key security guarantee without redundancy. Front-loaded with the action ('check') and scoped to a clear resource, with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter tool with no siblings and no output schema, the description covers the tool's purpose and a key security property. However, it does not describe the output format (e.g., boolean, status object), so an agent cannot fully anticipate how to interpret the result. This is a minor gap given the simplicity, but real.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, and an empty schema means there is nothing to document. The description adds no parameter information because none is needed, satisfying the baseline for 0-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the tool's purpose: check GitVerse transport and authentication readiness. The verb 'check' and specific resource make it unambiguous. With no sibling tools to differentiate from, it stands alone effectively.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies this is a safe readiness check, but it doesn't explicitly state when to call it (e.g., before executing GitVerse operations) or when not to use it. No alternatives are mentioned, leaving usage context implicit rather than explicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
v0.1.0- First observed
gitverse_connection_status
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlapping purposes. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as a status check.
The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (gitverse_connection_status), which is descriptive and consistent. There are no other tools to create inconsistency.
One tool is too few for a server named 'gitverse-connector', which implies a broader scope of connection management. A single status check tool feels minimal and likely insufficient for real workflows.
The server only provides a status check with no connect, disconnect, or resource access operations. For a connector, this is severely incomplete and would leave agents unable to perform any actual connection tasks.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
A MCP server built for developers enabling Git based project management with project and personal…
AI-native git hosting — repos, PRs, issues, CI gates, and AI code review over MCP (60 tools).
GitLab MCP — wraps the GitLab REST API v4 (BYO API key)
The Cortex MCP server provides read-only access to real-time engineering context from the Cortex developer portal, allowing AI coding assistants to answer natural language questions about your organization's catalog (microservices, libraries, domains, teams, infrastructure), scorecards (engineering standards and best practices), initiatives (goals and deadlines), and Engineering Intelligence metrics. It includes tools for querying documentation, tracking personal entities, and accessing AI-assisted insights across the entire Cortex ecosystem.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables managing GitHub repositories, files, and user information through MCP, with support for creating, updating, and deleting repository contents, as well as fetching user profiles.1-
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables secure interaction with GitLab instances through MCP, supporting projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, and search.632AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables self-hosted, read-only remote interaction with GitHub repositories, allowing listing repositories, searching code, and inspecting commits, pull requests, issues, and diffs via authenticated MCP clients.78 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only browsing and querying of GitHub repositories, including listing repos, reading files, fetching READMEs, searching code, and viewing commit history via MCP.-