drive_list_labels
Retrieve all labels defined in Synology Drive, including their ID, name, and color.
Instructions
List all labels defined in Synology Drive (id, name, color).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve all labels defined in Synology Drive, including their ID, name, and color.
List all labels defined in Synology Drive (id, name, color).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description carries full burden. 'List' implies read-only and non-destructive; no side effects are mentioned. Sufficient for a simple list tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with key info front-loaded ('List all labels'). No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Complete for a simple list tool: states action, resource, and output fields. No output schema needed given the description sufficiently conveys return format.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters in schema; description adds no additional parameter meaning. Baseline 3 applies as schema coverage is 100%.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (List), resource (all labels in Synology Drive), and output fields (id, name, color). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tool drive_add_label.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The context is clear: listing labels is a read operation and complements drive_add_label. However, no explicit when-not or alternative guidance is provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/vocweb/synology-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server