Skip to main content
Glama

list_ip_pools

Read-onlyIdempotent

List all IP address pools with subnets and usage summaries to find pool IDs, detect range overlaps, and page through results using offset tokens.

Instructions

[READ] List all IP address pools with subnets and usage summary.

Returns the result envelope; check truncated before calling it complete. Page it: limit is the page size (1-1000, default 50; 0 or negative is rejected), offset is how many rows to skip, and the response carries next_offset — pass that back as offset and stop when it is null. Do not loop on truncated: that says this page is not the whole collection, so it stays true on the last page of a walk.

Use this first to resolve a pool_id, then get_ip_pool_usage for the actual allocations — the summary here does not tell you which addresses are taken. Run it before create_ip_pool to avoid overlapping ranges.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoPage size, 1-1000 (default 50).
offsetNoRows to skip; pass the previous response's `next_offset`.
targetNoNSX Manager target from config (default if omitted).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.8.16
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": 50,
      +  "description": "Page size, 1-1000 (default 50).",
      +  "title": "Limit",
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / offset
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": 0,
      +  "description": "Rows to skip; pass the previous response's `next_offset`.",
      +  "title": "Offset",
      +  "type": "integer"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / target / description
      Added value: +"NSX Manager target from config (default if omitted)."
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.7.6
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "properties": {
      -    "result": {
      -      "items": {
      -        "additionalProperties": true,
      -        "type": "object"
      -      },
      -      "title": "Result",
      -      "type": "array"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "required": [
      -    "result"
      -  ],
      -  "title": "list_ip_poolsOutput",
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  3. First observedv1.3.2

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnly/idempotent annotations, it discloses pagination semantics: checking truncated, passing next_offset back as offset, stopping when null, and why not to loop on truncated. It also notes the summary does not reveal individual address allocations, which is a material behavioral limitation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose, then structured into pagination and workflow guidance. Each sentence carries operational value and there is no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description still covers the essential return envelope fields (truncated, next_offset), pagination, and the relationship to sibling tools. An agent has everything needed to call it correctly and interpret the response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is already 100%, and the description adds operational meaning: limit is the page size with rejection of 0/negative values, offset is rows to skip, and next_offset should be passed back. This is more than the schema's field descriptions provide.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with '[READ] List all IP address pools with subnets and usage summary,' giving a specific verb, resource, and scope. It later contrasts with get_ip_pool_usage and create_ip_pool, so an agent can distinguish it from the closest siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says to use this first to resolve a pool_id before get_ip_pool_usage, and to run it before create_ip_pool to avoid overlapping ranges. This provides clear when-to-use guidance and names alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.