Skip to main content
Glama
vmware-skills

VMware-Monitor

host_investigation_bundle

Read-onlyIdempotent

Investigate an ESXi host with one correlated drill-down: returns host state, cluster, VM rollup, datastores, alarms, live performance, and merged events. Use after cluster health summary flags a host.

Instructions

[READ] "What is happening around this ESXi host?" — one correlated drill-down.

Use this instead of stitching list_esxi_hosts + host_performance + get_alarms

  • get_events yourself. Returns one correlated bundle (not the list envelope): the host's state (connection, CPU/memory pressure, version, uptime), its cluster, a rollup of the VMs it runs, the datastores it mounts, alarms across host/cluster/datastore, live performance, and a merged event timeline. All reads are batched. Explain it in operational language; do not dump it raw.

Reach for it after cluster_health_summary flags a host. Point-in-time snapshot — no trending; for syslog lines use host_log_scan. Acting on a finding (maintenance mode, evacuate) belongs to vmware-aiops.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
hoursNoEvent-timeline look-back window in hours (default 24).
targetNovCenter/ESXi target from config (default if omitted).
host_nameYesExact ESXi host name; unknown names return a teaching error. Get it from list_esxi_hosts or cluster_health_summary first.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.9.2
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / host_name / description
      Added value: +"Exact ESXi host name; unknown names return a teaching error. Get it from list_esxi_hosts or cluster_health_summary first."
    • addedInput schema / properties / hours / description
      Added value: +"Event-timeline look-back window in hours (default 24)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / target / description
      Added value: +"vCenter/ESXi target from config (default if omitted)."
  2. Addedv1.7.6

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the tool read-only/idempotent; the description adds return-shape context ('one correlated bundle, not the list envelope'), batching behavior, point-in-time semantics, and output guidance (operational language, not raw dump). No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose, then uses short paragraphs for alternatives, return contents, trigger context, and limitations. Every clause adds non-redundant information and nothing reads as filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description compensates by itemizing the bundle's contents (host state, cluster, VM rollup, datastores, alarms, performance, event timeline) and its operational caveats. Given the tool's read-only nature and well-documented parameters, nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All three parameters are fully documented in the schema with defaults and usage notes (e.g., exact host name, teaching error, hours look-back). The main description does not add parameter meaning, so the high schema coverage baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific analytical operation ('correlated drill-down' around an ESXi host) and enumerates exactly what the bundle contains, distinguishing it from the list tools and from sibling bundle tools for VMs and datastores. The opening question makes the intent unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says to use this instead of manually chaining four listed tools and specifies the trigger ('after cluster_health_summary flags a host'). It also gives exclusions: no trending, syslog needs host_log_scan, and remediation belongs to vmware-aiops.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.