TonePerfect MCP server
Related Servers
Alternatives to TonePerfect MCP server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLocal MCP voice coach that provides English pronunciation, grammar, and fluency feedback from microphone recordings. It supports free-form voice conversation, focused practice drills, phoneme-level feedback, prosody hints, and learner-profile guidance.843 PyPI3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides local speech-to-text and text-to-speech through MCP and HTTP, enabling transcription, voice output, and standalone voice workflows without a gateway.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to place, monitor, and hang up phone calls through authenticated tools, retrieve transcripts, and exchange correlated task results with a waiting host. It supports simulated or live calling with persisted call lifecycle records, duration limits, and idempotent requests.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProfile-driven MCP server for Google Cloud Text-to-Speech that exposes tools to synthesize text to speech, run diagnostics, and stop playback, with voice and settings locked per profile.34 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to list and inspect evaluation tasks, score model answers, run the full benchmark, and retrieve provenance information.266 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that analyzes TTS audio recordings, providing transcription, quality scoring, pacing analysis, and mispronunciation detection to debug voice call center audio.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool maps to a clearly distinct stage of the workflow: discovery (list_languages), assessment (assess_pronunciation), and post-hoc interpretation (explain_result). There is no overlap in inputs or outputs, and explain_result explicitly references the output of assess_pronunciation, reinforcing the pipeline.
All three names follow a strict snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_languages, assess_pronunciation, explain_result). The verbs are accurate and consistent in style, with no mixed conventions.
Three tools is a tight, well-justified surface for a focused API wrapper covering capabilities, scoring, and result explanation. Every tool earns its place and none appears redundant or thin.
The core lifecycle (discover capabilities, assess audio, explain scores) is fully covered with no dead ends for the primary use case. Minor gaps remain, such as checking credit balance or listing/batch-assessing multiple recordings, but these are workarounds rather than blockers.