mcp-etf-holdings
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-etf-holdings
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time stock market data through Yahoo Finance without requiring an API key. Get quotes, historical data, company information, financial statements, and ticker search capabilities.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides Claude with real-time ETF research tools including quotes, expense ratios, full SEC-filed holdings, overlap analysis, comparisons, and performance data without requiring an API key.974 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time stock data, historical analysis, and stock comparisons using the Yahoo Finance API.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform live stock and portfolio research using Yahoo Finance data, including quotes, fundamentals, price history, news, portfolio analysis, and ticker comparisons.-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables real-time stock analysis across US, Indian NSE, and BSE tickers through Yahoo Finance, with tools for prices, history, financials, peer comparison, technical indicators, sector overviews, and interactive dashboards.7-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceFree stock, ETF & crypto analysis for AI agents: 10-point score, descriptive verdict and all key metrics for any ticker. Remote MCP server (Streamable HTTP, no auth, nothing to install) at https://www.stoxlyonline.com/api/mcp, plus a stdio server (server.js) for platforms that run MCP servers as a local process. Rate limit: 30 tool calls per IP per hour. Docs: https://www.stoxlyonline.com/mcp42MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: etf_info vs compare_etfs is well-differentiated by the single-vs-multiple guidance, and search_etfs vs lookup_symbol target different lookup types. The main overlap is find_etfs_holding_stock and stock_exposure_summary, which both find ETFs holding a stock, but the descriptions explicitly clarify the difference (extra expense ratio/AUM and sorting).
All names use snake_case, but the patterns vary: etf_info (noun_noun), compare_etfs (verb_noun), etf_holdings (noun_noun), find_etfs_holding_stock (verb_noun_noun), stock_exposure_summary (noun_noun_noun), search_etfs (verb_noun), lookup_symbol (verb_noun). The inconsistency in verb-first vs noun-first and use of prefixes/suffixes makes it mixed but still readable.
Seven tools is well-scoped for an ETF holdings and exposure analysis server. Each tool covers a distinct operation (metadata, comparison, holdings, reverse lookup, exposure summary, search, symbol resolution) without obvious redundancy or bloat.
The surface covers the core workflows well: ETF discovery, metadata, comparison, holdings, reverse holdings lookup, and exposure analysis with cost/size. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no full holdings beyond top positions, no historical performance beyond trailing returns), but these are likely outside the server's stated scope and can be worked around.