Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to secretguard-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Scans diffs, files, and snippets for leaked secrets like AWS keys, GitHub tokens, and private keys, returning redacted findings while running fully locally without network calls.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Scans text and files for common secrets (AWS, GitHub, etc.) and redacts them to prevent credential leakage in AI-assisted development. Runs entirely locally with no telemetry.
      12 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an agent to scan text for leaked credentials locally before it writes or commits it, flagging known key, token, private-key and sensitive-filename patterns with redacted, line-level findings and no network calls. Detection is deliberately specific to avoid false positives that would block unattended agents.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Scans files, directories, and environment configurations for exposed secrets, API keys, and credentials, redacting matches and providing allowlist support. Enables natural-language secret detection in projects and CI/CD integration via CLI.
      869 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Scans code for exposed secrets, API keys, tokens, and credentials across 69 patterns covering cloud services, AI platforms, payment providers, authentication services, and databases.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The purpose is unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool name 'scan_for_secrets' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, consistent with common MCP naming conventions. With a single tool, there is no inconsistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is minimal for a focused secret-scanner server, but feels thin compared to typical MCP servers that offer a broader range of operations. The count is borderline.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool covers the core functionality of scanning for secrets in code snippets, and no obvious additional operations are needed for this narrow domain. The tool description explicitly addresses proactive scanning before commits, making it self-contained.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues